- From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:09:23 +0100
- To: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@gmail.com>
- CC: stellato@info.uniroma2.it, 'Aldo Gangemi' <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>, public-ontolex@w3.org
Dear Armando, Aldo, of course, every contribution in any section is welcome. On what you say: I understand that many resources have been migrated into RDF, but one issue I see is that they all use a different vocabulary. Would it not be could to have one vocabulary that is general enough to represent all these lexical resources? One to bind them all so to speak ;-) Philipp. Am 03.02.13 00:58, schrieb Aldo Gangemi: > Hi Armando, I think any contribution from within the community group is welcome :) > > On Feb 2, 2013, at 2:31:16 PM , "Armando Stellato" <stellato@info.uniroma2.it> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >>> Anyway, I had previously updated the requirements for lexical resources, >> so >>> John, if you want to discuss my updates let's do it on the list. >>> As I said last time, we shouldn't concentrate in representing WordNet or >> any >>> other specific resource: fo rmany of them, work has been done and we do >> not >>> need to redo it again. >>> However, we need to abstract from the requirements coming those resources >>> in order to make them as interoperable as possible without unnecessary >>> complexity. >>> Aldo >> May I contribute to that req or the wiki is intended for the main >> investigators of each requirement section? (maybe in the section discussion >> of the page?). I had some ideas about interoperability, in the spirit of: >> http://art.uniroma2.it/software/LinguisticWatermark/images/LinguisticWaterma >> rk-id.gif >> http://art.uniroma2.it/publications/docs/2008_SWAP2008_LinguisticWatermark3. >> 0.pdf >> >> surely they can be modeled better (supporting linguistic interoperability in >> software tools was the aim there, and no a rigorous lexical model), but I >> think that is the thing Aldo is hinting to, too. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Armando >> >> P.S. In any case I'll be off for 3 days due to a project final meeting, but >> can go over it on Friday or the following week >> >> -- Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano Semantic Computing Group Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) University of Bielefeld Phone: +49 521 106 12249 Fax: +49 521 106 12412 Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de Room H-127 Morgenbreede 39 33615 Bielefeld
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 08:09:53 UTC