- From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 07:49:53 +0100
- To: public-ontolex@w3.org
Aldo, oh yes, absolutely right. Philipp. Am 22.03.12 16:16, schrieb Aldo Gangemi: > Another one: the skos-xl community [1] > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/skos-xl.html > > Inviato da Aldo > > Il giorno 22/mar/2012, alle ore 14:56, Jorge Gracia<jgracia@fi.upm.es> ha scritto: > >> Hi Philipp, >> >> Let me this last minute addition to the lists (I can post it there myself): >> >> DCMI Vocabulary Management Community >> http://dublincore.org/groups/vocabulary-management/ >> >> Regards, >> Jorge >> >> 2012/3/22 Paul Buitelaar<paul.buitelaar@deri.org>: >>> Philipp, I will also post at relevant LinkedIn groups: >>> >>> - Semantic Technologies Group >>> - Natural Language Processing >>> - Semantic Search >>> >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> Op 22/03/2012 11:08, Philipp Cimiano schreef: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> thanks for all your feedback. I have changed the text according to >>>> your suggestions. You will find it below. I have not included specific >>>> research groups here as I assume that you will circulate the call in >>>> your own groups (UPM, DERI etc.) as well as reasearch groups that work >>>> on related topics. >>>> >>>> The target group is now the following: >>>> >>>> Projects: >>>> >>>> - Metanet -> Nicoletta >>>> - Flarenet -> Nicoletta >>>> - Molto Project -> Paul >>>> - Multilingual Web WG -> Felix >>>> - IKS -> Aldo >>>> - LOD2 -> Philipp (via Sören Auer) >>>> - DARPA's Machine Reading -> Philipp >>>> - Open Information Extraction -> Philipp (Oren Etzioni) >>>> >>>> Companies >>>> >>>> - SAP -> Philipp >>>> - IBM -> Philipp >>>> - Elsevier -> Philipp (Veronique Malaise) >>>> - Mondeca -> Paul (Bernard Vatant) >>>> - Semantic Web Company -> Emilio >>>> - Zemanta -> Philipp (Andraz Tori) >>>> - OpenAmplify -> Aldo >>>> - Alchemy -> Aldo >>>> - Expert System -> Philipp (Nico Lavarini) >>>> - SAS -> Philipp >>>> >>>> Mailinglists: >>>> >>>> - DBWorld -> Philipp >>>> - Semweb@w3c -> Philipp >>>> - Corpora list -> Paul >>>> - Linguist list -> Philipp >>>> - ELRA -> Nicoletta >>>> - Open Linguistics -> John >>>> - ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net -> Paul >>>> - Red Linked Data -> Jorge >>>> - SemWebSpain -> Jorge >>>> >>>> - Associations >>>> - ATALA -> Maxime >>>> - Web Semantique -> Maxime >>>> - ACL (not sure, Maxime: why do you think this would be interesting to >>>> ACL? We are reaching most of the ACL community through the corpora and >>>> linguistlists anyway, right?) >>>> >>>> Could I kindly ask all of you to send the call to the above lists etc. >>>> this week? Please confirm that you have sent it so that I can keep track >>>> of where the call has been sent to. >>>> >>>> Now we will start working on the requirements on the model. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Philipp >>>> >>>> ================================================== >>>> >>>> *Call for use cases for the ontology-lexicon model * >>>> >>>> >>>> The W3C Community Group on Ontology Lexica [1] has started its work in >>>> December 2011. >>>> >>>> *** Motivation *** >>>> >>>> Ontologies have numerous applications and they represent the conceptual >>>> backbone of the Semantic Web. In fact, significant work has gone into >>>> standardization efforts under the auspices of the W3C to produce >>>> recommendations for data and knowledge representation languages, i.e. >>>> the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and the Web Ontology Language >>>> (OWL). However, current web-based knowledge representation languages >>>> such as OWL and RDF(S) lack the rich linguistic grounding that is >>>> required for language-mediated access to ontologies. OWL and RDF(S) rely >>>> on a property rdfs:label to capture the relation between a vocabulary >>>> element and its (preferred) lexicalization in a given language. This >>>> lexicalization provides some kind of lexical anchor that makes the >>>> concept, property, individual etc. understandable to a user. The >>>> mechanisms for linguistic grounding available in OWL and RDF(S) are thus >>>> far from being able to capture the necessary linguistic and lexical >>>> information that NLP applications working with a particular ontology >>>> need. The mission of the Ontology-Lexicon community group is to develop >>>> a model for the linguistic grounding of ontologies which allows to >>>> represent lexical entries containing information about how ontology >>>> elements (classes, properties, individuals etc.) are realized in >>>> multiple languages. A more detailed overview of the scope and goal of >>>> the working group can be found at [3]. >>>> >>>> *** Open Call for Use Cases *** >>>> >>>> With this call for use cases, we intend to expand the scope of our >>>> current use cases (see [2]) by including use cases that are inspired by >>>> more concrete and real applications. >>>> >>>> We thus call for participation of industrial stakeholders and >>>> application developers in the Community Group by providing a description >>>> of a use case using the template found below. >>>> >>>> By this, we offer interested parties the opportunity to participate in >>>> standardization activities that are relevant and potentially beneficial >>>> for their application development, and contribute their ideas to the >>>> process of creating a standard for the representation of ontology >>>> related lexicons. >>>> >>>> We kindly ask you all to send the use case description to Philipp >>>> Cimiano (cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de) until May 3rd. Any questions >>>> or comments can be addressed to Philipp Cimiano at the above email >>>> address. >>>> >>>> *** Participation in the Group *** >>>> >>>> People interested in the group’s activities, discussion and >>>> teleconferences are welcome to join the group at [1]. >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/ >>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Use_Cases >>>> [3] >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Goals_and_Scope_of_Ontology-Lexica_Community_Group >>>> >>>> >>>> >> <TEMPLATE> >>>> I. Motivation >>>> >>>> This should contain a short motivation of the use case, including a >>>> description of the application context and why it is relevant to specify >>>> the meaning of words with respect to a given ontology in the context of >>>> the application. >>>> >>>> II. Description of the use case >>>> >>>> This section should describe the use case in more detail, specifying >>>> what the lexicon-ontology interface would need to look like from the >>>> point of view of the application and how the lexicon-ontology interface >>>> is exploited in the context of the given application. If available, the >>>> ontology for the application should be briefly described. >>>> >>>> III. Limitations of existing models >>>> >>>> This section should discuss existing models and their limitations with >>>> respect to the needs of the application in question. >>>> >>>> IV. Example >>>> >>>> This section should provide a concrete example illustrating what kind of >>>> knowledge should be stated in the lexicon-ontology interface from the >>>> point of view of the application and how it would be exploited by the >>>> application. >>>> >>>> V. Requirements >>>> >>>> This section is optional and might already advance concrete requirements >>>> on the lexicon-ontology model. >>>> >>>> <TEMPLATE> >>>> >>>> ================================== >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano >>>> Semantic Computing Group >>>> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) >>>> University of Bielefeld >>>> >>>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249 >>>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412 >>>> Mail:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de >>>> >>>> Room H-127 >>>> Morgenbreede 39 >>>> 33615 Bielefeld >>>> >>> -- Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano Semantic Computing Group Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) University of Bielefeld Phone: +49 521 106 12249 Fax: +49 521 106 12412 Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de Room H-127 Morgenbreede 39 33615 Bielefeld
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 06:50:24 UTC