- From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:07:21 +0100
- To: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F63C7A9.2080408@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Dear all, in our telco on the 3rd of February, we decided to have an open call for use cases. On the basis of our discussion at our last teleconference on the 9th of March, I have modified the text, in particular shortening it (see below). We also agreed to send this open call to the following projects/organizations/mailinglists: Projects: - Metanet - Flarenet - Molto Project - Multilingual Web - IKS Companies - SAP - IBM - Elsevier - Mondeca Mailinglists: - DBWorld - Semweb@w3c - Corpora list - Linguist list - ELRA Are there any additional suggestions? Please send me your comments by Wednesday 21st of March. I will then modify the document accordingly and start sending it short thereafter. Best regards, Philipp *Call for use cases for the ontology-lexicon model* Since December 2011, the W3C Community Group on Ontology Lexica [1] has started its work. *** Motivation *** Ontologies have numerous applications and they represent the conceptual backbone of the Semantic Web. In fact, significant efforts have gone into standardization efforts under the auspices of the W3C to produce "recommendations" for data and knowledge representation languages, i.e. the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and the Web Ontology Language (OWL). However, current web-based knowledge representations languages such as OWL and RDF(S) lack the rich linguistic grounding that is required for language-mediated access to ontologies. OWL and RDF(S) rely on a property rdfs:label to capture the relation between a vocabulary element and its (preferred) lexicalization in a given language. This lexicalization in some sense provides a lexical anchor that makes the concept, property, individual etc. understandable to a user. The mechanisms for linguistic grounding available in OWL and RDF(S) are thus far from being able to capture the necessary linguistic and lexical information that NLP applications working with a particular ontology need. The mission of the Ontology-Lexicon community group is to develop a model for the linguistic grounding of ontologies which allows to represent to lexical entries containing information about how ontology elements (classes, properties, individuals etc.) are realized in multiple languages. A more detailed overview of the scope and goal of the working group can be found at [3]. *** Open Call for Use Cases *** With this call for use cases, we intend to expand the scope of our current use cases (see [2]) by including use cases that are inspired in more concrete and real applications. We thus call for participation by industrial stakeholders and application developers in the Community Group by providing a description of a use case along the template found below. By this, we offer interested parties to participate in relevant standardization activities and have the chance to contribute with their ideas to the process of creating a standard for the representation of ontology lexica. We kindly ask you all to provide send the use case description to Philipp Cimiano (cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de) until May 3rd. Any questions or comments can be addressed to Philipp Cimiano at the above email address. *** Participation in the Group *** People interested in the group's activities, discussion and teleconferences are welcome to join the group at [1]. [1] http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/ [2] http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Use_Cases [3] http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Goals_and_Scope_of_Ontology-Lexica_Community_Group <TEMPLATE> *I. Motivation* ** This should contain a short motivation of the use case, including a description of the application context and why it is relevant to specify the meaning of words with respect to a given ontology in the context of the application. ** *II. Description of the use case* ** This section should describe the use case in more detail, specifying how the lexicon-ontology interface would need to look like from the point of view of the application and how the lexicon-ontology interface is exploited in the context of the given application. If available, the ontology for the application should be briefly described. ** *III. Limitations of existing models * ** This section should discuss existing models and their limitations with respect to the needs of the application of question. ** *IV. Example* ** This section should provide a concrete example illustrating what kind of knowledge should be stated in the lexicon-ontology interface from the point of view of the application and how it would be exploited by the application. ** *V. Requirements* ** This section is optional and might already advance concrete requirements on the lexicon-ontology model. <TEMPLATE> -- Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano Semantic Computing Group Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) University of Bielefeld Phone: +49 521 106 12249 Fax: +49 521 106 12412 Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de Room H-127 Morgenbreede 39 33615 Bielefeld
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 23:07:54 UTC