- From: Mo McRoberts <Mo.McRoberts@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:41:57 +0000
- To: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>, "public-odrl@w3.org Group" <public-odrl@w3.org>, Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
It’s very likely to be an error in my diagramming. However, the examples were written to the ontology, so if it was an error there then it’d be no surprise the examples were wrong :) Will need to cross-check against the XML schema to be sure. M. -- Mo McRoberts - Chief Technical Architect - Archives & Digital Public Space, Zone 2.12, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA, BC3 A6, Broadcast Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TP, 0141 422 6036 (Internal: 07-311707) - PGP key CEBCF03E On 19/02/2016, 05:46, "Nandana Mihindukulasooriya" <nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote: >Hi, > > >According to ODRL 2.1 ontology [1], the odrl:duty property [2] has Permission class as the domain and Action/Duty classes as the range. The examples in the document illustrate the same. However, the diagram [3], it shows that duty is a relationship between > a Policy [e.g., Offer] and a Rule [e.g., Duty]. > > >Is there an inconsistency in the diagram or am I reading it wrong? > > >Best Regards, >Nandana > > >[1] https://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/ODRL21 >[2] https://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/ODRL21#term-duty >[3] https://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/diagram.png >
Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 10:46:25 UTC