- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:26:27 +1000
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-odrl@w3.org
> On 17 Mar 2015, at 08:10, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > > We're just discussing whether we should define them in our own namespace, and I guess we would be happy not to do it if ODRL had them. P3P has always had a good set of purposes: http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P11/#ppurpose Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 11:26:59 UTC