Re: Reaction and questions to new docs

> On 12 Mar 2015, at 06:53, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> 
> I guess ODRL might need some additional space for non-IPTC examples, such as the wiki as Renato suggested.
> I wish I could help, but I'm afraid the only thing I can offer is the sort of discussion we're having now, and share our example data, when we end up using ODRL. For the moment we're focusing on simple things...

Examples are always good to share....add them  here if you like: https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/wiki/Use_Cases
And then post for discussion...

> As a matter of fact, my question on labels and documentations was maybe about even more informal types of text than NewsML-G2's "usage terms". Just a simple name for a rights statement (as the title at [1]), and a brief definition or scope note!
> We're actually considering skos:definition and skos:scopeNote from the SKOS ontology for the notes about the rights statement, and skos:prefLabel or dc:title for their label.

This is why we did not try to specify any properties for "documentation"...there are plenty of existing vocabs and communities will choose their preferred option. :-)


Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

Received on Friday, 13 March 2015 12:32:42 UTC