- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:29:01 +1000
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-odrl@w3.org
> But it is really not easy for us understand how to use ODRL, even with the enhanced documentation. Hi Antoine - The current ODRL specifications are written primarily as normative documents - and it would be good to have a set of companion "usage guidelines" that explored a number of implementation scenarios. (we even have an Issue [1] raised for this, but looking for volunteers) > This is difficult to assess as it's unclear where profiles are documented. The Common vocabulary https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/vocab/2.1/ says "see also Section 3 Profiles" but there's no such section anywhere. Which is rather surprising to find *after* the closing of a call for comments by the way. That was an editorial error, as we moved all the Profile information from the Vocab spec into the Model spec. (Now fixed) > If it is too late for you to answer such things now that you've closed the call for comments, we'd understand of course. > If you're happy with happy with this kind of conversation, we will probably come with more questions in the very near future. We can always develop additional specifications/reports to help implementors. Or even use our wiki to capture "how to" examples. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com +61 4 1313 2206 Chair, W3C ODRL Community Group http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/ [1] http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/track/issues/3
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2015 12:29:35 UTC