- From: Michael Steidl \(IPTC\) <mdirector@iptc.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:06:42 +0100
- To: "'ODRL Community Group'" <public-odrl@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Renato Iannella'" <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Message-ID: <019e01cff923$41388b30$c3a9a190$@iptc.org>
ODRL Group: This summer some language was added to the ODRL Core Model (http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-core-model-constraint-draft-chang es/#section-2) to clarify the context of policies including this sentence "Based on that context, an ODRL Policy must contain at least one Permission and may contain Prohibitions." This clarifies the context and fits into a wider context but the implementation of <o:permission> as a mandatory element in the XML Encoding appears to be wrong: - The Inheritance design of ODRL (http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-core-model-constraint-draft-chang es/#section-211) outlines that policy document B could be a child of policy document A inheriting its permissions and prohibitions. - By that design it could be the case that policy document A defines a permission and policy document B adds only a prohibition - This meets the basic rule for a policy as the full policy is the union of the policy documents A and B - and this union meets the rule of a mandatory permission. - But how to tackle the mandatory <permission> element in policy document B if a permission doesn't make sense in this context? Therefore IPTC proposes to remove the "required" cardinality of <permission> in the XML Encoding document - and points at the JSON Encoding document which does not include a required permission. It would make sense to add a note to both Encoding specifications that if the full policy is made of multiple documents only a (virtual) union of them has to meet the "one permission is required" rule of the Core Model and not each policy document. Thank you, Michael Michael Steidl Managing Director of the IPTC [mdirector@iptc.org] International Press Telecommunications Council Web: <http://www.iptc.org/> www.iptc.org - on Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/IPTC> @IPTC Business office address: 25 Southampton Buildings, London WC2A 1AL, United Kingdom Registered in England, company no 101096
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:07:16 UTC