Re: Asset as superclass of Policy / Asset not superclass of Policy. Asset same as Thing.

On 16 Jul 2013, at 22:06, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

> As it wasn't, Asset exists in the ontology as a compatibility shim and little more. I really think the spec text is where the adjustment ought to be made.

ok, we can update the Model spec (as we have a draft version update [1])...what is the best description for the Asset?

Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

[1] http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-core-model-constraint-draft-changes/

Received on Monday, 22 July 2013 05:04:06 UTC