Re: Namespace of ODRL

I think it would make sense to have a consistent value for namespaces. I
would however propose that we add versioning to namespaces (perhaps by date),
thus allowing newer additions to namespaces without necessarily impacting
deployments in the field.

Alapan

On Thursday, July 4, 2013, Renato Iannella wrote:

> I would support a move to a single namespace. The question is, which one.
>
> For XML we use  http://w3.org/ns/odrl/2/ for the model and direct URLs
> for the vocab: http://w3.org/ns/odrl/vocab#<term>
>
> We have (tentatively) used http://w3.org/ns/odrl/model# and
> http://w3.org/ns/odrl/vocab# in the Ontology.
>
> We could reuse one of the above and put model/vocab together, or create a
> new one for both.
> We could easily do either of these for the Ontology/JSON work (as these
> are new) but then need to consider the XML work (that is, how widely, V2
> XML has been deployed)
>
> Cheers...
> Renato Iannella
> Semantic Identity
> http://semanticidentity.com
> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
>
>

-- 
Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------
Life's a gamble - take a chance