Thanks Jonas/Stuart..... One question from example three: > "@vocab": "http://w3.org/ns/odrl/vocab#", > "permission": "http://w3.org/ns/odrl/2/json#permission", > "asset": "http://w3.org/ns/odrl/2/json#asset", > "action": "http://w3.org/ns/odrl/2/json#action", > "prohibition": "http://w3.org/ns/odrl/2/json#prohibition", Is the reason we use the "json" namespace because JSON-LD can only support one vocab? If so, should we look at a single namespace for ODRL? Apart from this, after you make the changes to the current draft, I can then publish as an "Draft Report". Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 02:29:09 UTC