On 18 Apr 2013, at 23:15, "Myles, Stuart" <SMyles@ap.org> wrote: > For example, a client of AP might be contracted to take a feed of photos. Let’s pretend that feed consists of hundreds of photos a day. For a particular photo within that feed, we need to be able to communicate that it is not allowed to be used by newspapers in the UK. Another photo might require a mandatory credit of the originating agency (e.g. the European Photo Agency). Given that these are not agreements in themselves but are instead to be interpreted as a sort of “exception” or particular set of permissions, restrictions or constraints that must be observed for a particular piece of content, doesn’t “set” make the most sense in that situation? Sturt - this use case seems to fit (or need) the inheritance structure of ODRL ? That is, there is an Agreement A between parties B and C for asset X with Terms Y....then a specific policy is created which inherits from Agreement A for Asset X.1 with new Terms Y.1 ? Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 16:03:29 UTC