- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:36:57 +1000
- To: Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-odrl@w3.org Group" <public-odrl@w3.org>
On 11 Apr 2013, at 22:48, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote: >> - Question - look at use of SKOS for documentation of Ontology (rather then Dublin Core) > > Which aspect is this referring to? (there isn't much DC in there at all, I don't think?) Yes, I think there is one dct:description! The note was to see if/how adding SKOS would/could improve the ontology... >> - Provide Human Documentation of Ontologies [RI] > > How much should this be autogenerated? My personal feeling is that it should be *autogeneratable* as much as possible (so the the documentation is self-contained), even if it's then turned into HTML or wikitext with some hand-cranking and published somewhere. That said, I know it doesn't have complete descriptions for everything yet. Agree - for now I was just going to add links to LODE that auto-generates some human-friendly ontology description: http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/owlapi/http://ptah.bencrannich.net/2013/UNSTABLE/model.rdf http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/owlapi/http://ptah.bencrannich.net/2013/UNSTABLE/vocab.rdf Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 04:37:24 UTC