- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:45:58 +0200
- To: Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at>
- CC: Serena Villata <serena.villata@inria.fr>, Sabrina Kirrane <sabrinakirrane@gmail.com>, "ODRL Community Group (Contrib)" <public-odrl-contrib@w3.org>
Yes, hence my concern about "having conflicts for the conflict resolution" odrl:conflict may declare prohibitions take precedence in general, but one specific permission may gain precedence if so declared with the odrl-ld:precedenceOver. I wonder how can we specify this beyond an English sentence. Also, I think the RDF Shapes spec is truly clear. But... which should be the reference software to validate the expressions? I have peeked here http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/ShEx, but I am unsure about it... Where should I look at? Víctor El 04/06/2015 11:28, Simon Steyskal escribió: > 4) Well to some extend.. While odrl:conflict only allows to state that > in case of conflicting rules either the permission or prohibition > takes precedence, odrl-ld:precedenceOver would allow to specify that > specific rules (if they are applicable too) can take precedence over > others regardless their respective type. -- Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informática Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain Tel. (+34) 91336 3672 Skype: vroddon3
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2015 09:46:32 UTC