- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:50:04 +1000
- To: Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: "ODRL Community Group (Contrib)" <public-odrl-contrib@w3.org>
On 22 May 2014, at 08:26, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > I wonder, and it may not be a good option, whether it’s worth considering the unified ODRL, with some of the profiled elements removed, and so on, to be an “ODRL 2.1”, rather than just a minor variation on 2? So we would not then really use the current URI (http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/) instead we would go to final versions using http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/21/ Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 03:50:51 UTC