- From: Michael Steidl \(IPTC\) <mdirector@iptc.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:03:08 +0200
- To: <public-odrl-contrib@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <018101cf7e7c$254e59d0$6feb0d70$@iptc.org>
All: I've been asked by lawyers about specific permissions (and prohibitions) and their relationship to "any other action" in a wide context: Example: a permission to use a photo for printing is granted by an ODRL policy. This policy includes the single permission and nothing else. This raises the question - at least for lawyers: what about all the other actions in the ODRL vocabulary (and maybe beyond it)? Are they implicitly prohibited? At first sight I was not able to find a rule for that in the ODRL Data Model - maybe I missed a paragraph. To solve this issue I see two options: i/ To write down in the ODRL specs that the default state is: "nothing is permitted", only explicit permissions lift that. The exact role of a prohibition in such a context would need a good explanation. Ii/ To define a super-generic "any-other-action" action and to recommend using this as explicit prohibition with each policy. Thanks for your comments, Michael Michael Steidl Managing Director of the IPTC [mdirector@iptc.org] International Press Telecommunications Council Web: <http://www.iptc.org/> www.iptc.org - on Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/IPTC> @IPTC Business office address: 25 Southampton Buildings, London WC2A 1AL, United Kingdom Registered in England, company no 101096
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 16:03:41 UTC