- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:17:42 +0200
- To: public-odrl-contrib@w3.org
- CC: vrodriguez@fi.upm.es
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2014 12:18:02 UTC
Dear all, In the Draft Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) Ontology, there is an example of the utmost importance, which I copy here for your convenience (boldface and red is mine). |@prefix odrl: <http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/> . @prefix dct: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . <http://example.com/asset:9898>_*dct:license*_ <http://example.com/policy:0099> . <http://example.com/policy:0099> a odrl:Set; odrl:permission odrl:reproduce ; odrl:prohibition odrl:modify . | I wonder myself about the following issues: 1. Why are we choosing dct:license? Shouldn't we have had a property called: "/odrl:policy/"? 2. Why not others? (dct:accessRights etc.)? Any thought about this? Regards, Víctor
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2014 12:18:02 UTC