Re: Updated Common Vocab

Great (though not volunteering for encoding ;))!

Would we need to arrange any specific place holders with W3C for the
namespace? I don't think w3c.org/ns/ODRL resolves to anything right now ...
Is the path even acceptable to W3C? Are there specific w3c guidelines in
this regard?

Alapan

On Friday, 23 March 2012, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote:
>
> On 23 Mar 2012, at 02:56, Alapan wrote:
>
> I would have thought that the namespace should be actively resolvable.
Thus, since this is on http, putting "http://w3.org/ns/odrl/vocab#play" in
to my browser, I would get something, relating to "play" - such as a
definition of what is play for example.
>
> Hi Alapan - you are correct - the plan is make these resolvable to
something useful!
> The most common approach is to return some RDF for each term.
> We can do this, once we have an RDF/OWL encoding….
> (Any volunteers?????)
> Cheers...
> Renato Iannella
> Semantic Identity
> http://semanticidentity.com
> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
>

-- 
Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------
Life's a gamble - take a chance