- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:55:30 +0000
- To: Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammarchi@gmail.com>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > This is awesome!!!! The only thing I believe is missing is the ability > to specify a compression encoding as gzip or deflate in order to boost > up repeated properties name as well as base64 data. All those thoughts > don't seem to be an issue (root type is fine as it is, name paths look > good too) . If kept simple, this might land pretty soon as polifill > too. Thanks for sharing! Agree. This seems really useful. Getting compression for free when POSTing would be nice too :)
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 17:55:59 UTC