Re: Blog post for review

forgot to answer: yes, looks good .. but does W3C actually follow this
manifesto? I hope this group is meant like that and able to make things
snappier for real, in terms of delivering.

I also hope this won't cause an uncontrollable browser fragmentation ... I
mean, even worst than current one, where every script needs 387 checks
before knowing what's available at that time for that browser.

br


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammarchi@gmail.com> wrote:

> it's fine for me ... no 404
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Still getting a 404.
>>
>> Yehuda Katz
>> (ph) 718.877.1325
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:04 PM, François REMY <
>> francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you try this link instead?
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/community/**nextweb/?p=23<http://www.w3.org/community/nextweb/?p=23>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Marcos Caceres
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 10:03 PM
>>> To: François REMY
>>> Cc: public-nextweb@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Blog post for review
>>>
>>>
>>> Getting a 404? :(
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marcos Caceres
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 20:51, François REMY wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi everybody,
>>>>
>>>> I just wrote a small blog post on the recent publication of the
>>>> Extensible Web Manifesto by @wycats. I try to explore more of the reasons
>>>> behind the movment, and why it is beneficial to the platform as a whole.
>>>>
>>>> It’s not like if I was creating something truly original here, but I
>>>> think it would be a shame not to feature this on the homepage of our group
>>>> :-) If you want to have a look, the preview is here:
>>>> http://www.w3.org/community/**nextweb/?p=23&preview=true<http://www.w3.org/community/nextweb/?p=23&preview=true>
>>>>
>>>> Don’t hesitate to make comments or point out typos ^_^
>>>> François
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>