- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:35:28 +0200
- To: "Brian Kardell" <bkardell@gmail.com>, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: <angelina@mozilla.com>, <public-nextweb@w3.org>
The most important thing is probably to standardize the words "prollyfill" and "polyfill" so that people can search relevant repos using github ;-) If the idea is to allow peer-review of prollyfills, could we use Github issues on a special repo (PolyfillReviews) instead of merges to a JSON file? This is probably better because we can make comments on the submission, refers to other repo & issues, include codes... and close them when the polyfill has been peer-reviewed (people can always reopen the thread when a new version comes out).
Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 19:35:54 UTC