- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:54:40 +0000
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com>, "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: > This is actually exactly what I am suggesting I think... Marcos and I had an etherpad with some notes/discussion... Not sure what happened to it, I can't seem to find it ATM. Essentially though, it should be easy enough to just provide some DOM info (class or something) indicating that something is WEB-IDL, drafts should probably already have that defined... We can parse and generate stubs out of it. The stubs could contain meta-information (or generate a seperate meta-file) which would allow reversing the process to keep the draft up to date.. I think it would be fine if we ran this in parallel to implementing WebIDL. Then we can figure out how we bring everything together. Just approach this as a prototype and see if you can come up with a few different solutions. -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 18:55:11 UTC