- From: Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:26:22 -0700
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CD197194.34C7%clint.hill@gmail.com>
I pulled the latest this morning and the build was just fine. From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> Date: Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:09 PM To: "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org> Subject: Merged a lot Resent-From: <public-nextweb@w3.org> Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:10:05 +0000 Guys, I've merged Marco's pull request... Despite the fact that all of the issues say "implement" which Marcos clearly has accomplished, I didn't follow through and close them because a couple of them had open comments/notes... Francois, can you just quickly take a look through the ones where Marcos had a question and maybe determine if you would like to make note of it, open a new issue on it or whatever? I don't want to lose the open questions... I'd like to close these out and get some test suite running them thatso that we can have the edge/fringe sort of debates and have something we can safely rework if necessary... The current tests only check that an item exists and, well - the test harnessing itself seems broken to me. To that end: can someone verify that the build is borked? I was unable to run it ... jshint which complains for me on the webidl file iteself, not anything recently added because of the Function constructor and use of __proto__... I was able to put them into a local server and manually make the adjustments/copies that the build work and things worked fine though... -- Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com <http://hitchjs.com/>
Received on Monday, 14 January 2013 15:27:12 UTC