Re: Tests

+1 on grunt
+1 on qunit

Grunt will also help us resolve the AMD/build question from the other
thread.


From:  Mat Scales <mat@wibbly.org.uk>
Date:  Tuesday, January 8, 2013 12:52 PM
To:  "&lt,public-nextweb@w3.org&gt <mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org&gt> ,"
<public-nextweb@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: Tests
Resent-From:  <public-nextweb@w3.org>
Resent-Date:  Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:52:55 +0000

If we use grunt (which I HIGHLY recommend) then it is trivial to get set up
with automated tests using phantomjs, which is awesome. For actual test
framework qunit is simple and effective, but I also like mocha+chai.


On 8 January 2013 19:45, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> The code I proposed currently lacks tests (on purpose!) as I was not sure what
> we should use for that and how we should structure them.
> 
> That is, obviously, for each WebIDL type we should have a set of tests that
> checks the conversion is happening as expected.
> 
> Any guidance on how to proceed would be great!
> 
> --
> Marcos Caceres
> 
> 
>