- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:45:04 +0000
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Cc: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>
> I am not an incredible fan of the idea of using typescript here, but I suppose I could get over it since the output should be valid vanilla js...
Some minor problems I see from looking at the examples are things like
class Foo{
someFunction(){ … }
}
become:
var Foo = (function(){
this.prototype.someFunction = function(){...}
}();
IMHO, that seems kinda wrong to me? Every time the constructor is called the prototypes are rewritten?
> More importantly though: I think we should focus on evergreen browsers... any attempt to do more I think is way harder, bad and inevitably involves polyfills and shims - even worse it propigates the problem by not providing incentives to get one. There is simply no rationale for not having one at this point - we should be encouraging the _next web_.
Right.
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2013 11:45:34 UTC