Re: Logo

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com> wrote:

> To clarify: My +1 was for the logo and not the robot. I believe the mascot
> idea is premature and I'd rather us not weigh in on a mascot. Let's skip
> the robot part of this for now. Logo contest is also premature. The logo
> seems agreeable to all.
>
> Call it done?
>
>
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:38 AM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Monday, November 19, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:
> >
> >> I don't love the rust color or the robot... i'd also love to see
> something more dash-like than bullety as it represents the forms in
> css/html < -x- >.
> >
> > That might be good to see. I'm also sold big on robot man… it's a bit
> ... manly.
> >> One thought I had though was, why not throw some basic ideas of what we
> would like in a logo up there and run a logo contest - it might spark
> interest and get a lot of other people to do some free design work for us.
> >
> > I'm not sure we should do this, tbh. It's more stuff we would need to
> manage with the limited resources we have. I'd be happy if we just went
> with a slight variation of François' logo.
> >
> > --
> > Marcos Caceres
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Yes, I think for now the logo is fine and all further discussion at this
point would be, essentially, the definition of bikeshedding :)
(... but obviously it should be blue).