Re: Posted

Annex A.  
Comment: "Firstly, they can leverage based on their innovations." This has IPR issues, but I'm not a lawyer.   

Annex B.  
You say, "So, they’re trying to do their best to make their latest innovations cross-compatible, providing polyfills when needed." But you don't provide an example.  

Grammar: "don’t ship any browser," > "don’t build any browsers,"

Grammar: "make already use of prolyfills to improve their tool chain" > "already make use of prolyfills to improve their tool chain"

In "Also, there’s a strong incentive", remove "Also,".  

Maybe Change: "solve their own issues that nobody except them will ever care about (in a foreseeable future)" > "solve their immediate problems, but can have wider benefit in the future"

Annex C  
"not everybody want" > "not everyone wants"

--  
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au


On Saturday, 17 November 2012 at 21:50, Marcos Caceres wrote:

> Hi François,  
> Looking good and makes sense… review of the first part:  
>  
> Grammar:  
> "forced to stop to support Flash on mobile"
>  
> Should be:
> "forced to stop supporting Flash on mobile"
>  
>  
> Typo:
> and are were not done in a forward-compatible way.
>  
>  
> Should be:
> "and were not done in a forward-compatible way."
>  
> Should the following:
> "Libraries like jQuery reminds us it’s still easy enough to work with the native DOM libraries for most developers."
>  
> Be maybe changed to:
> "Libraries like jQuery remind us that it's still a challenge to work with the native DOM interfaces."
>  
>  
> Typo:
> "fast as a standard native code"
>  
> should be:
> "fast as standard native code"
>  
> Typo:
> too high-levels > too high-level
>  
> Question: CSS Grids is an API?  
>  
> Grammar:
> "you were forced to mess up with the other’s features" > "you messed up other's features"
>  
> Grammar:
> A lot of work still need to be done in order to allow > A lot of work still needs to be done in order to allow
>  
>  
> From "This is why we launched a while back", maybe remove "a while back" as it seems like it happened a long time ago.  
>  
> You say "to create an environment that plays nicely with polyfill authors", but it's ambiguous what you mean by "environment".  
>  
> Grammar:
> "and that allow us" > "and that allows us"  
>  
> This is ambiguous: "At nExt Web" (I thought maybe that was a conference or something). Maybe say "In the next web," or "In the web we are building for the future" or something similar.  
>  
> I think this is a big claim: ", never break."
>  
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> Marcos Caceres
> http://datadriven.com.au
>  
>  
> On Saturday, 17 November 2012 at 21:28, François REMY wrote:
>  
> > Here's my attempt on the same subject (I take a sligly different approach to  
> > the question, which is probably more metaphysical than really pragmatic).
> > http://fremycompany.com/BG/2012/How-the-web-disrupted-Innovation-327/
> >  
> > Comments/feedback are welcome ;-)

Received on Saturday, 17 November 2012 22:00:51 UTC