- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:03:37 +0100
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: "public-native-web-apps@w3.org" <public-native-web-apps@w3.org>
On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 10/2/12 7:30 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > > With the launch of the SysApps WG [1], what do we foresee as the function of this CG? > > > > We haven't really done much since we launched so we should probably consider winding this group down. > > I'm indifferent but do want to mention one advantage of this CG ... > > Given the broad scope of SysApps, I can imagine some W3C Members not > being able to formally join the WG because of the broad upfront IP > commitment that is required. As such, this CG could be used to engage > such Members but with a much more limited IP commitment (f.ex. a Member > could only contribute to one of the WG's specs). (At least I believe > things could work this way ...) > > But as I said, I don't really care either way ... The problem, IMHO, is that the scope of this CG is also too broad - and I think that meant that despite all good intentions, almost no work items were produced here. To address your concern, there is almost no overhead to starting a new CG for a particular item that may spin off the WG. A smaller, more focused CG may work more effectively than this one. -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 15:04:07 UTC