Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?

On 6/6/12 5:02 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
>
>> Absolutely, or:
>>  
>> <html manifest=/path/to/config.webapp>
>>  
>> and combine appcache and config into a single format. The AppCache
>> manifest format works beautifully in JSON (and I'm sure it would do
>> equally well in XML). See how the sample manifest files provided in the
>> HTML5 spec[1] would look like in JSON: https://gist.github.com/2881982
>
>yep, that could also workŠ though I wonder if it's too late to be
>swapping manifest formats.

The two manifest formats could very well co-existing. Furthermore, since
only the structure of the data differs, the AppCache algorithm wouldn't
need to change.

--tobie

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 15:11:09 UTC