- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:16:26 +0000
- To: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-native-web-apps@w3.org
On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Scott Wilson wrote: > On 24 Feb 2012, at 14:39, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Scott Wilson wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Looks like MPEG-U also defined extensions related to inter-widget communications: > > > > > > http://concolato.wp.institut-telecom.fr/widgets/mpeg-u/ > > > > > > ... which has been standardised as ISO/IEC 23007-1:2010. > > > > > > How does this fit our IWC use cases? > > > > I honestly never looked at the work those guys did in any detail :( I'm also not aware of any MPEG-U user agents in the market. > > I know Samsung were involved in this work, but I also couldn't find any MPEG-U implementations when I did a quick search. > > However, if there is an existing IWC spec it would make sense to use it rather than invent another ... > Well, at least we should have a look at it to determine if it meets the use cases (and if it can be implemented on various platforms…. there may be other, um *cough* IPR *cough*, issues :) ). -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 15:16:58 UTC