- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:03:51 +0100
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>, public-native-web-apps@w3.org
On Monday, November 28, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > I can understand that perspective if a CG is effectively a discussion > group. However, for this CG, where a focus is writing specs that will > eventually go to the Recommendation track, I think using term 'charter' > makes sense because effectively, that is what Marcos created and it is > applicable. > > That said, I don't feel strongly enough for this to be a blocking issue. Neither do I… I just figure, if it looks like a charter, then we might as well call it that :) -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Monday, 28 November 2011 12:04:31 UTC