- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:17:10 -0400
- To: public-n3-dev@w3.org
- Cc: William Van Woensel <william.vanwoensel@gmail.com>
On 3/16/19 9:15 PM, William Van Woensel wrote: > I think that having a lightweight notation (i.e., lacking quantifiers) > is an especially interesting aspect of N3. It allows developers to use > N3 at the level of complexity that suit their needs. Nevertheless, IMO > this also means outfitting N3 with the necessary constructs to suit more > complex use cases for developers who need them. +1 I could not have stated it better! > . . . > Having rules operate on graphs instead of RDF stores may also point > towards the usefulness of e.g., scoped negation as failure and limiting > the scope of quantifiers (i.e., to a particular graph) (?) We had a > discussion <https://github.com/w3c/N3/issues/9#issuecomment-458874667> > on this on the GitHub page. +1 David Booth
Received on Monday, 18 March 2019 17:17:33 UTC