- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:46:49 -0500
- To: public-n3-dev@w3.org
Thanks Nathan for getting this going! To introduce myself, I've been involved with Semantic Web technology since about 2002-2005, when I was a W3C Fellow from Hewlett-Packard (HP). Since about 2009 my focus has been on applying this technology to healthcare and life sciences. I am a co-founder of the Yosemite Project, which seeks to promote RDF as the basis for healthcare data interoperability: http://yosemiteproject.org/ And as you probably know, :) a big concern of mine lately is about how we can make the whole RDF ecosystem easier to use, so that *average* developers can be successful with it. I have always liked the simplicity of N3, and have been previously disappointed that it hadn't gotten more standardization and tooling uptake. I can probably help with discussion and editing -- possibly more. I also wonder if N3 could be a good starting point for a higher-level RDF language -- N4? -- that would provide direct support for n-ary relations, property graphs, etc., to make user's lives even easier. However, it may be best to treat that as a separate effort, to avoid slowing down N3 standardization. Thanks! David Booth On 11/29/18 3:03 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote: > Hi all, thanks for joining the n3-dev CG. > > Since the holiday season is fast approaching, we should perhaps aim to > start ramping up communications and efforts from the new year. > > If you know anybody else who may be interested in joining, or should be > involved, please encourage them to join the CG via > https://www.w3.org/community/n3-dev/ > > In the interim, please do share anything you think is pertinent, > including related background reading and references, or anything you'd > like to discuss. It may also be useful to start collating > implementations, any nuances or bugs that have been found after working > with the current specification [1] (see also [2]), also suggestions on > what could be improved / simplified / expanded / removed. > > Let's all get on the same page, agree what to do, and get it done. > > Personally I'll commit time, discussion, spec writing, mistakes, and > working reference implementation(s). Throughout the current decade I've > frequently thought or said I/you/we could do this with n3, so before the > turn of the next decade, /I want/ to be using n3+rules daily, at scale, > and will do my utmost to facilitate you all in using it for what you > want or need too. > > Thanks all, and I look forward to working you all in the coming months, > > Nathan > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/n3/ > [2] https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.html
Received on Friday, 30 November 2018 15:47:12 UTC