- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:40:59 +0200
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-mwts <public-mwts@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > Le mercredi 30 septembre 2009 à 15:32 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit : >> Also, does going to LC again re-open an exclusionary period? I think >> we can't go to Rec (and probably not to PR) until the exclusionary >> period is over. Dom? > > A new LC opens a 2 months exclusion period during which the group is not > supposed to go to PR, indeed; the only way to shorten that period is for > every AC Reps in the WebApps WG to agree to waive their exclusions > rights - which given the size of the group is likely to be a difficult > exercice... > Ok, well that put an end to my evil master plan, then (And I would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling process kids! ) :) I'll leave it to those that know the process better and just focus on making a good spec and test suite. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 14:41:53 UTC