W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mwts@w3.org > September 2009

Re: [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:59:34 +0200
Cc: marcosc@opera.com, public-mwts <public-mwts@w3.org>, public-webapps@w3.org
Message-Id: <3C6AA05E-A83D-43C7-A64C-7DE9CD4EA1F0@berjon.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
On Sep 29, 2009, at 18:36 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> For what it's worth, given that:
> * P&C has been vastly rewritten
> * test results collection hasn't started (AFAIK)
> * you're suggesting to remove a bunch of conformance requirements  
> which
> could be assessed as a substantive change
> I think it might be worth pushing P&C to a short Last Call period (3
> weeks), asking to focus only on the changes since CR, and then when  
> the
> implementation reports are finalized, ask to go to PR directly.

I like this plan. My primary concern is that we communicate it clearly  
to third parties.

Also, do we have some visibility on which implementations (and how  
many) stand a chance of passing the TS?

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 09:00:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:34:13 UTC