- From: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:05:50 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, public-mwts@w3.org
- Message-Id: <408B7B7D-AFCD-4A41-97B5-F978FBE0CCF7@gmail.com>
Apache Wookie got 2 that failed, and the rest couldn't run - I think because WindowWidget is not required for all UAs to conform, but is required as a prerequisite by the test. After some tweaking I got some slightly more useful results... so its definitely a start! We've been using this for testing up until now, which is just hand crafted test cases and isn't generated from IDL: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wookie/trunk/widgets/test.wgt S On 28 Oct 2009, at 21:52, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le mercredi 28 octobre 2009 à 22:43 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux a > écrit : >> Since I don’t have a widgets engine that would implement the spec, I >> haven’t been able to check if they detect anything remotely useful, >> but >> I’m hoping they do — maybe someone with such a runtime engine could >> load >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/tests/idl-gen/all.html and >> see if >> any tests pass? > > Actually, I’ve just remembered that Opera had graciously shared an > early > build of the next version of their widgets runtime engine, and running > it on the test widget, I get 15 tests that pass and 13 that fail (17 > that couldn’t be run due to the said failures), which make me hopeful > the tests are actually useful. > > I’m naturally still interested on feedback on the generated tests. > > Dom > > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 15:06:29 UTC