- From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:41:26 -0400
- To: ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-mwts@w3.org" <public-mwts@w3.org>
On Oct 1, 2009, at 5:58 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: >> A rough schedule would then be: during the Nov 2-3 f2f meeting agree >> to all changes for LC#3; November 10 LC#3 is published and Exclusion >> period begins; December 1 LC#3 ends; Dec 9 CR#2 is published; >> January 5 CR#2 ends as does the Exclusion period; mid January >> publish PR. > > This is the part that I'm not sure I understand. Do we really need to > wait until the F2F to agree to the changes that need to be made? My > understanding is that Marcos has almost integrated all of them, and > also that we believe we now have a level of review way above anything > we had before. Why not just go into LC#3 next week, and hit CR#2 at > the F2F? I can see my email can be interpreted as "we must wait until the f2f before agreeing to changes" but what I meant is more like "let's make that the deadline for any LC#3 changes". Naturally, we should try to get consensus on all CR issues as soon as we can. Give the July CR says it will not end until November 1, it would seem a bit strange if we published a new LC before then. Given this and the publication moratorium around the TPAC time frame, I think Nov 10 is the first publishing opportunity. Perhaps one of the Team members can provide some guidance on the rules and/or precedence for that. -Regards, Art Barstow
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:42:19 UTC