- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:03:24 +0200
- To: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>
- Cc: public-mwts@w3.org
Hi Kai, Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 15:09 +0100, Kai Hendry a écrit : > http://static.webvm.net/wct/svgt.html > > I had a look at green.svg and I thought it was missing the SVG tiny > doctype since it is tests specifically SVG tiny. Probably doesn't > matter. > > Anyway I found an old test from Chris Lilley and modified it a little > and called it http://static.webvm.net/wct/green-hard.svg > > gzip -c green-hard.svg > green-harder.svgz I reviewed the proposed harder SVG test, and it looks good to me; it is only fractionally harder (because it tests a pretty specific possible parsing error), but with the gzipping added, I think it makes for a better test overall. I have added it to the list of proposed additional tests: http://www.w3.org/2008/06/mobile-test/ > I also thought we could gzip it and see if that works. Surprisingly it > doesn't work in FF3, but it does on my S60 browser: > http://static.webvm.net/wct/green-harder.svgz That's because the file isn't served with the Content-Encoding: gzip header, which I think is required by HTTP in this case. (I made sure that it is served correctly for our test) Dom
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2008 15:04:47 UTC