- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:34:57 +0100
- To: public-mwts <public-mwts@w3.org>
Hi,
The minutes of our teleconf today are available at:
http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-mwts-minutes.html
linked from
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/Tests/
and copied as text below.
Dom
Mobile Web Test Suites Working Group teleconf
30 Oct 2007
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mwts/2007Oct/0012.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-mwts-irc
Attendees
Present
Carmelo, Jenise, Wilhelm, Dom, dmitri
Chair
Dom
Scribe
dom
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]OMA liaison work items
2. [6]NIST contributions
3. [7]mobile ACID test:
* [8]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
OMA liaison work items
Dmitri: I've looked a bit in the SVG Tiny 1.2 test suite
... and looked at the OMA ETR document
... I have drafted a message for the SVG Working Group
... on which Dom commented
... I'll update the message and send it to the SVG group in a couple
of hours
... as far as I understand, our future work depends on the current
state of coverage report from the SVG Working Group
... if they have a complete coverage report or a complete set of
test assertions, we can understand what features requirement from
the OMA group has been tested
... if they don't (or only a high level report), we'll probably need
to do the coverage analysis ourselves
... in which case, we'll need quite a bit of resources to do this
... I have a question, though: is the coverage report a requirement
for test suites for working groups?
Dom: no, it isn't unfortunately
... I doubt the SVG group will have a detailed report
... W3C groups rarely have enough resources for this
Dmitri: in this case, what should we do? doing a full coverage
report will require a lot of resources
Dom: one solution would be to look at the SVG Tiny test suite, where
I think the test cases names give a rough indication of what
features are tested
... and compare that list of features to what the OMA would need
Dmitri: the OMA divided their test requirements by features too, so
it may help us do the job
<scribe> ACTION: Dmitri to do a high-level coverage analysis of the
SVG Tiny 1.2 [recorded in
[9]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-mwts-minutes.html#action01]
Dom: good work!
Dmitri: I'll send the message to SVG WG after this meeting
Carmelo: I contacted the the CSS Working Group about CSS MP 2.0 test
suite
... I'll come up with a plan to fill the gaps between the WCSS and
CSS MP, that I can present during the F2F
Dom: re XHTML MP test suite, I sent a first corrected part of the
test suite, based on the bug report I sent a few weeks ago to the
oMA
... hopefully they can integrate it in their test suite without too
much legal troubles
NIST contributions
-> [10]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/mwts-nist/ NIST test cases
contributions
[10] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/mwts-nist/
Carmelo: this is based on the XHTML MP test suite, to complete some
holes in the forms module
... it isn't full coverage of the module, but it's already an
improvement
... please have a look at it, and send us feedback (or we can look
at that during the F2F)
Dom: thanks for the contributions!
... I'll send feedback, have already a few comments to make
mobile ACID test:
-> [11]http://www.jwtmp.com/a/ mobile ACID test
[11] http://www.jwtmp.com/a/
dom: [introduces the concept of ACID2 test as emulation, and how it
applies to mobile]
Wilhem: concepts sounds great; the implementation needs some
refinements
... will send details by email
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Dmitri to do a high-level coverage analysis of the SVG
Tiny 1.2 [recorded in
[12]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-mwts-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 15:35:32 UTC