- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:10:09 +0100
- To: Allen Wang <Xiaozhong.Wang@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-mwts@w3.org
Hi Allen, Le jeudi 18 janvier 2007 à 16:54 -0800, Allen Wang a écrit : > >* another approach that I think would be interesting to consider is to > >focus on non-conformance tests suites (!); the idea would be to assemble > >and create tests cases that wouldn't focus so much on whether a given > >browser conforms to a given specification, but instead, to identify > >common browsers behaviors for things that are un- or ill-specified, and > >that web developers need data on. > > > > This certainly is an interesting idea. However, it seems that focusing > on non-conformance test suites may contradict to our charter: > > "The test suites ... could be suitable for checking conformance of user > agents to specifications in the mobile Web space." Note the "could"; in other words, this is not an obligation of our charter, but a possible direction. > So I suggest we as the members still focus on the conformance part of > the test suite but leave the non-conformance part largely to the > community, as Dom suggested. That sounds good in theory, but if we want the latter part to happen, we would need to provide the infrastructure to do so - e.g. a system to contribute tests cases, a test harness, a test reporting system, etc. We would also likely need to review the submissions of test cases; could you clarify whether you think we shouldn't even provide that infrastructure and only focus on conformance tests suites? > Also, we may want to get input from the Mobile Web Initiative group as > they may have a better understanding of the priorities of our group. At this point, I think it's really up to us to decide, based on our evaluation of the needs from the community, vendors, etc. Dom
Received on Friday, 19 January 2007 08:11:37 UTC