- From: Max Froumentin <maxf@webfoundation.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:20:56 +0200
- To: CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com>
- CC: boyera@w3.org, public-mw4d@w3.org
Hi all, Thanks for a very interesting discussion, which I'm catching up on late, unfortunately. Couple of comments below. > 3. Regarding how to best reach rural, international farmers, I don't > quite agree with you that SMS text broadcasts of crop prices for > different markets, if encoded with symbols in a graph-like format, would > be much less accessible to rural farmers than voice information. > > (You say under "Technology," > "E.g. a sms-based agriculture service in ‘Direct Access’ is unlikely to > reach all farmers given the ability of farmers to use SMS") > * * * > My Example (a possible way to reach farmers via SMS): > > > RICE (currently the only suitable symbol is U+1F35A at > http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1F300.pdf which might not be > supported by the SMS system so a pix of rice might have to be broadcast > before the SMS data; this is a drawback): Indeed. I just did a small test texting: "1F332 FISH CAKE WITH SWIRL DESIGN [🍥] and 1F35A COOKED RICE [🍚]" (from Skype) to various devices: - iPhone: displays 1F35A but not 1F332 - Samsung Galaxy Tab (Android): displays neither - Motorola V220 (from around 2003): neither - Nokia xpressmusic (from around 2006): neither - doesn't even recognise UTF-8 and displays 2 blocks for each character. So I think we can discard fancy unicode symbols for a while. Probably not a problem for currency symbols though, which are (I suspect) optional in most cases. ASCII art is also quite difficult in that the content of SMSs is displayed in variable-length fonts, and thus the text wraps in unpredictable ways. Ironically, it used to be easier before, when phones had monospaced fonts. So all is left are one-line ASCII pictograms. Eg, Fish <º)))>< I suspect that, to people with low reading skills, "F" is just as good a symbol for fish than <º)))><. But I'm not an expert and only a proper field study would show that. However if some people who are number-literate only and who can reportedly do MPESA banking just by knowing which key to press to get to their account balance, I can imagine that decoding symbols that aren't pictograms is not impossible, and is the only way to use SMS-based services. Opinions from a specialist in low-literacy most welcome. Max.
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 09:21:05 UTC