- From: Katrin Verclas <katrin@mobileactive.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:20:33 -0400
- To: <atanu@srijan.in>
- Cc: "'Stephanie Rieger'" <steph@yiibu.com>, <public-mw4d@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <C09E1AB8-D9F4-4B2A-83A6-99FC9AAC4CCC@mobileactive.org>
Just so that you all know - we have a growing number of mobile tools for dev, mobile media, etc in our mDirectory. Currently 82, with more being added daily: http://bit.ly/cqDD4p Are you planning on reinventing the wheel? Would it not make more sense to collaborate here? On Jul 29, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Atanu Garai wrote: > When we discuss about tools as software application, I think it is > important to discuss about content and service associated with it. > This will be particularly important when we discuss about the > applications of these tools for specific domains and target > audience. I am sure this was in your mind but would like to make > this objective more explicit. > > Atanu > -----Original Message----- > From: public-mw4d-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mw4d-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Stephanie Rieger > Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 6:46 PM > To: public-mw4d@w3.org Group > Subject: Tools methodology > > Hello, > > I've volunteered to begin thinking about the Wiki's tools section > and how best to develop a criteria to assess the suitability of each > tool. > For reference, here is what is currently posted on the Wiki in > regards to the goals of the overall activity. > > "It is critical to develop a real landscape analysis, investigating > the exact domain of applicability of the different tools, how they > relate one to another, what is their target audience, what are their > requirements for usage, etc. As part of these investigations, the > growing importance of social networks such as twitter or facebook in > developing countries and their potential roles in social development > will be studied. This document will define a methodology to review > mobile tools available for the different technologies, develop a > landscape analysis based on the definition of taxonomy or matrix of > factors to consider to select a tool. The document will also > identify gaps, in software, features or standardization, that > prevent more people from deploying content and services." [http://www.w3.org/2008/MW4D/wiki/Mw4d_tools > ] > > Stephane has suggested I post this to the group for comments. We > also plan to discuss this further on Monday during the meeting. The > list of assessment criteria below is preliminary...just to get the > conversation started. > > Category - SMS, MMS, mobile web, voice, service etc. > > Cost to the organisation - One-off cost, subscription, cost of > associated tools or components etc. > License - Is the tool (or aspects of it) open source? Are there > license restrictions? > Roadmap - Are new features planned? Is the tool relatively future- > proof from a technology point of view? > User base - Is the tool proven? How many existing users/deployments? > Are there case studies available? > > Ramp-up - Time required to set up, specific technology required such > as a certain type of server, a Mac etc Skills - Required technology > skills, programming languages, other skills to operate or deploy the > tool. > Maintenance - Resources required to maintain the tool or service > including time and personnel, frequency of maintenance etc. > Documentation - Is documentation available? Is it comprehensive? It > is multi-lingual? Online or offline? Who is the target audience? > > Target audience - What audience can be served using this tool (age, > demographic, region etc.) Reach - Projected reach of the tool. Are > there external factors that will affect reach of this tool > (geographic, language, cost, required > partnerships?) > Cost to end-users - If the output of this tool requires interaction > by end-users, what are their costs? (hard costs, time required for > users to learn interface, language, specific mobile platform etc.) > > Some of these factors already seem to overlap so feedback would be > welcome. Reminder as well that this list is incredibly preliminary! > > Best regards, > > Steph > > http://yiibu.com > Yiibu: Lovingly crafted mobile experiences > > +44 (0)7957 651 177 > Twitter: stephanierieger > > > Katrin Verclas MobileActive.org katrin@mobileactive.org skype/twitter: katrinskaya (347) 281-7191 A global network of people using mobile technology for social impact http://mobileactive.org
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 17:21:11 UTC