- From: Stephanie Rieger <steph@yiibu.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:28:08 +0100
- To: "public-mw4d@w3.org Group" <public-mw4d@w3.org>
Hello, Thanks very much to everyone who provided feedback during the recent tools discussion (both online and during the two teleconferences). All comments have been compiled and are now on the wiki in for review. This is still a work in progress so comments are of course welcome. The tools criteria currently consists of two tables. One represents criteria that is specific to those deploying a tool (e.g. an NGO, government etc) while the second represents criteria that would affect the end-users of the tool. Not all tools will have this second group of end-users so we have chosen to separate the criteria to ensure we can properly consider each group. http://www.w3.org/2008/MW4D/wiki/Mw4d_tools Please feel free to augment the content on this page or provide feedback on the list. I believe we will be discussing the tools methodology again at the next teleconference as well. It was also decided we should test the methodology fairly early on by choosing 2-3 tools that provide a similar service. We could then compare these tools using our preliminary set of criteria. This will hopefully indicate criteria that have so far been overlooked and ways to better organise the data. Suggestions for 2-3 similar tools that could be used in this investigation would be welcome. Best regards, Steph http://yiibu.com Yiibu: Lovingly crafted mobile experiences +44 (0)7957 651 177 Twitter: stephanierieger
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 17:28:46 UTC