- From: Arun Kumar <kkarun@in.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:50:01 +0530
- To: Richard Scullin <richard@MobileEd.org>
- Cc: Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>, public-mw4d@w3.org
Dear Richard, Sure, as mentioned I would be happy to give a demo and/or presentation to the group on VoiceSite creation by non-experts whenever Stephane deems fit to schedule it. thanks and regards Arun Kumar IBM Research - India Spoken Web (aka World Wide Telecom Web): http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_people.nsf/pages/arun_kumar.WWTW.html "Websites that use the spoken word will empower the illiterate" - http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13855374) Richard Scullin <richard@MobileEd .org> To Sent by: Arun Kumar/India/IBM@IBMIN public-mw4d-reque cc st@w3.org public-mw4d@w3.org, Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org> Subject 09/18/2009 12:59 Re: Feedback on Roadmap AM Arun, For what it's worth, I'd like to hear a presentation on VoiceSite, depending on scheduling. Good comments ( B . Costs [Section 6.1.5], etc.). Thanks. --Richard On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Arun Kumar <kkarun@in.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Stephane and All, > > I have few comments about couple of sections in the roadmap as it stands > now, along with possible corrections. > > > A. Access Challenges: Accessibility [Section 6.1.1] > > The first paragraph mentions that Accessibility is at least as equally > critical in Developing Countries as in Developed Countries. The WHO > reference about Visually Impaired people in developing countries that > follows in the next statement, however, suggests that the problem of > accessibility is probably more severe in Developing Countries. Reasons > include un-affordability of expensive assistive devices and technologies, > non-english speaking population and illiteracy etc. Further, as in the > visually impaired case referred above, a bulk of population needing but > deprived of such technologies reside in developing countries. > > > > B . Costs [Section 6.1.5] > > It is mentioned that Voice applications use the voice channel and it is > costliest as the charges are based upon the length of the call. With the > innovative strategies and value-adds that several telecom operators are > coming up with, this may not longer remain an issue. For instance, a couple > of major telecom providers (especially Reliance communications) in India > offer free calls to either a limited set of phone numbers or to callers > within the same telco's network or during non-peak hours (such as in the > night). > > http://www.efytimes.com/e1/fullnews.asp?edid=19268 > http://www.efytimes.com/e1/fullnews.asp?edid=15716 > > Most recently, another operator - Tata Indicom, has started offering > pay-per-call charging model, making call charges free of per-minute rate. > http://teck.in/pay-per-call-prepaid-plan-of-tata-indicom-and-tata-teleservices.html > > > > > > C. Technologies Section (Section 7) > > 1) > A major challenge listed in the Weakness of Voice Applications sub-section > is related to expertise required for building voice applications, i.e.. > expertise required to use voice modality on mobiles to provide an authoring > platform. As rightly mentioned in the roadmap, authoring of a voice > application has not been an easy task. However, the state-of-the-art here > has already advanced. This should probably be reflected in the document.. > Using the Spoken Web system (mentioned in Examples in Section 7.1), > ordinary phone subscribers can create their own Voice applications in a > matter or few minutes. These voice application creators can be non-IT > literate or even completely illiterate and can create the applications in > their own local language using an ordinary lowest end mobile phone. > > More details on the system are available in the articles mentioned below > and I would be happy to give a 15-20 min. live demo of VoiceSite creation > technology in the next conference call, if there is interest. > > [a] VOISERV: Creation and Delivery of Converged Services through Voice for > Emerging Economies > https://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_people.nsf/pages/arun_kumar..pubs.html/$FILE/VOISERV-IEEE-WowMom2007.pdf .. > > > [b] VoiKiosk : Content Creation and Dissemination by-and-for Users in Rural > Areas > > > http://mobileactive.org/research/voikiosk-content-creation-and-dissemination-and-users-rural-areas > > > [c] FOLKSOMAPS - Towards Community Driven Intelligent Maps for Developing > Regions > > http://www.researchintouse.com/downloads/spokenweb/Folksomaps_-_ICTD_09_-_April_09.pdf .. > > > > > 2) > A concern related to user issues is the challenge of discoverability of > voice applications. While complete automated indexing of voice applications > and search is still in its infancy, it is also not impossible for someone > to discover available services offered as voice applications. Manually or > semi-automatically created directories could provide phone numbers of > various businesses registered with them. This could be done either through > call center operations as in http://www.JustDial.com or through voice > search as being done by Ubona ( > http://www.webyantra.net/2007/11/08/ubonavoice-search-engine-for-bangalore/ > ) and GOOG-4-1-1 (http://www.google.com/goog411/ ). Here, the phone > numbers returned would actually represent voice applications deployed > against them. > > Such directory services can very well be used for discoverability of voice > applications. This is similar to the initial pre-search engine days of the > web when online sources such as Yahoo Directory containing categorized > content represented the primary source of discovering information on the > web. So, directories can serve the purpose of discoverability while search > technologies for Voice applications mature. > > > > 3) > Another issue mentioned is that the lifetime of the information is short > and cannot be stored and shared. Technologically it is not difficult to > provide. I believe such applications are not in vogue only because > businesses and other organizations have not yet realized the need to > explore the use of such means. This is changing too. For instance, in an > ongoing commercial pilot described at > http://hci.stanford.edu/research/otalo/ , Development Support Center (DSC) > - an NGO in Western Indian state of Gujarat runs a bi-weekly community > radio program about Agricultural best practices. It has an estimated > viewership of 5,00,000 farmers. It makes use of a VoiceSite (a voice > application in Spoken Web) that acts as a complimentary feedback channel > for the radio program and also serves as an archive of those radio programs > to be listened to later (by calling up the VoiceSite). In addition, expert > advice given to farmers, questions asked by others as well as discussion > threads among farmers themselves are captured and automatically made > available on the VoiceSite. > > > 4) > I agree with the suggestion in Future Directions subsection, that hosting > services similar to Tell Me are needed for large scale deployment of Voice > applications. Along with that we also need packaged software/hardware > 'appliances' to let individuals setup their own low scale voice application > creation and hosting using desktop PCs and a couple of incoming phone > lines. > > > > thanks and regards > Arun Kumar > IBM Research - India > kkarun@in.ibm.com > > Spoken Web (aka World Wide Telecom Web) : > http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_people.nsf/pages/arun_kumar.WWTW.html > > "Websites that use the spoken word will empower the illiterate" - > ( http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13855374. > ) > > > > > > Stephane Boyera > <boyera@w3.org> > Sent by: To > public-mw4d-reque Renjish Kumar > st@w3.org <renjish.kumar@gmail.com> > cc > public-mw4d@w3.org > 08/27/2009 07:57 Subject > PM Re: Feedback till section 4 and > objectives revised version > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Renjish, > > thanks a lot for your extensive review o fthe first parts. i integrated > most of your corrections in the documents except few of them: > - the change in the structure (respective place of scope and exec summary) > - your proposed objectives section, as you were using an old version and > not the latest one provided by mira. > - the change in the audience section > > the first and the third point should be discussed during the september 7 > teleconf to see where is the agreement in the group. > Concerning the second point, please review the new objective session > provided by mira and online now. > > Thanks again for the work > > Stephane > > Renjish Kumar a écrit : >> Hello, >> Attached are my comments and corrections (as track changes) on the >> roadmap doc till section 4. A revised version of the objectives section >> is also attached for your reference..... >> >> I am still in the process of going through the entire document.... sorry >> for this late entry after a long break... I was pressed for time due to >> some personal emergency during the last couple of months... but hope >> better late than never.... >> >> Regards >> Renjish >> >> > > -- > Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org > W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 > BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 > F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, > France > > > > > > -- Richard Scullin Founder, President MobileEd.org richard@MobileEd.org twitter.com/richardscullin +1 (413) 884-2995
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 08:20:57 UTC