- From: Renjish Kumar <renjish.kumar@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:55:59 +0530
- To: public-mw4d@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ad721fa60908200125q51d68a69q74ec119706d4ebef@mail.gmail.com>
Agree with Yoshiko. It is a usual practice to add real-life case studies in the appendix for reference and better understanding. Best practice will be to have a standard template for each case summary (no more than a page) covering the key aspects to be highlighted and source reference. Regards Renjish On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Yoshiko Kurisaki < yoshiko.kurisaki@icvolunteers.org> wrote: > Hello Team, > > Here are my thoughts. > > Real world examples help readers to understand the Roadmap. > > It also helps readers to neatly sort out contents of the Roadmap. > > I'd suggest to place real cases in Appendix, with reference to each > technology, voice, SMS, etc. The Appendix should be titled "Cases", rather > than "Analysis", as I don't think we need to analyse each case in the > Roadmap document. > > In the "Cases" section, putting a brief summary or explanatory title of > each case with its link would be sufficient. > > Cheers, > Yoshiko > > > > > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org> > Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:24:42 +0200 > Subject: Re: Example box > To: Mira Slavova <mira@mmd4d.org> > Cc: public-mw4d@w3.org > > >Hi Mira, > > > >> Overall, I think text boxes of this kind will serve to demonstrate the > >> relevance of the document, which can be fairly technical at time, and > >> whose audience is rather broad. > > > >Few comments: > >i'm a bit reluctant to copy and paste in the document something from > >sources not part of the group. Like this analysis of ivr is interesting > >but done by those who made the project imho. > >What about for each of the category of technologies having an entry in > >an appendix with the detailed analysis ? like from the ivr, we add a > >link to 'detailed analysis of an ivr application in Appendix A.1' where > >we put the doc you sent, with a link from the source ? > > > >So question to all: should that type of analysis, coming from external > >source be in the body of the document, on the appendix, or just linked ? > > > >cheers > >stephane > > > >> Cheers, > >> Mira > >> > >> -- > >> Dr Mira Slavova > >> > >> ICT4D Consultant > >> Mobile Market Design 4 Development > >> mmd4d.org <http://mmd4d.org> > >> ++44 (0)7734 408829 > > > >-- > >Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org > >W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 > >BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 > >F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, > >France > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > ICVolunteers / ICVolontaires / ICVoluntarios > P.O. Box 755, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland > http://www.icvolunteers.org > http://www.cybervolunteers.info > Phone: +41 22 800 1436 > Fax: +41 22 800 1437 > Email: yoshiko.kurisaki@icvolunteers.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 08:26:40 UTC