- From: Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:38:07 +0200
- To: Janusz Lukasiak <janusz@eumx.net>
- Cc: public-mw4d@w3.org
Hi Janusz, > My reading of the article is that there are two kinds of issues > 1) end users pay a lot for the download time > 2) limited bandwidth, affecting more-or-less everybody: "Businesses and > institutions also struggle; universities, for instance, need to block sites > such as Facebook, iTunes, and YouTube in order to keep their Internet > bandwidth available for scholarly research". that's indeed a good distinction to consider, and workaround both are essential. However the big difference i see is that very few people people are considering the first point. There are lots of global actions focusing on extending the bandwidth for e.g. sub-saharan africa. Those are huge infrastrucutre project, but very few work are done about how to reach the end-user, particularly how to deploy content on mobile phones, because it is considered as the role of mobile operators. So at high-level, people believe that deploying content to end-user is easy, overlooking the cost aspect, which is a "detail" for them, but that's what create a big divide between what is possible and what's happening imho. Therefore, i believe it is essential to show that yes deploying content to users is an issue, and there are workarounds. > Let's talk about the second point here. If institutions suffer from > b/w bottleneck, will they be willing to donate some b/w to downloaders? > I can (just about) imagine a university being happy for its students > to obtain free software over its internet connection, particularly if > it is related (even vaguely) to the curriculum, but why should external > users be allowed to use a scarce resource? Lots of university i know in Africa are largely involved in trying to help rural communities, developing projects and so on. so i'm sure that such a kiosk solutions would surely be of primary interest for them. > What about a 'caching toaster'? I mean a CD-recorder at the back (or > may be at the front...) of some sort of a web cache, aka a 'popular free > software repository'. It makes no sense to > download the same program over and over again each time another > user wants his/her own copy. Ok, this makes the 'toaster' more > complicated and expensive, but in places with existing IT support > (universities, larger libraries) this should not be a major issue. caching is indeed a potential solution. But well, this is a technological answer to a larger problem which is the lack of local content. Why the international bandwidth is so expensive in e.g. Africa ? First of all, because of the unbalanced aspect of the communication (content going from one side to the other always the same direction). So if there were more local content, not only it would be more adapted (contextually, culturally,...) to the local needs, but it would reduce the need of the international bandwidth. At the end, it might also happen that the communications would be more balanced, decreasing the cost of the bandwidth. So i believe that it is essential to understand what would be an enabling context, that would trigger the development of content and services locally. Education is one aspect for sure, but not the alone one. Understanding what kind of content and applications, how to make it accessible (again physically, culturally,...), how ot deploy it... My hope is that this group will work on identifying these different aspects that would create an enabling context. Cheers Stephane > Janusz Lukasiak > freelance IT consultant > janusz@eumx.net > > > -- Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org W3C +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 34 BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 08:38:44 UTC