- From: Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:02:06 +0100
- To: Arun Kumar <kkarun@in.ibm.com>
- CC: public-mw4d@w3.org
Hi Arun, > I can look up projects related to SMS, Voice, and web based access. I can > also dig some existing projects information in the agriculture and health > space. this is great, the list of commitment is growing ! > Is somebody going to reorganize the Stories wiki page along the > lines you suggested. yes, the somebody is me. I've the action to reorganize both the story page and the roadmap doc. I hope to do it for next call, taking place monday. > How do we contribute. I could not find a way to modify > the Wiki contents - Am I missing something ? yes. Because we had spammer issues in the past, there is no W3C wiki fully open to the public for contribution. Therefore, after one creates his/her account, (s)he has to ask the administrator of the wiki to become a contributor/editor. Being the admin of this wiki, i just validated your login to be an editor. Let me know if it works now. > On a related note, would we not want to address Q3 also. In my view that > would be most important. While Q1 and Q2 identify existing work and > consolidating what has been achieved so far, Q3 is what would > summarize/categorize the learnings from those and identifying > challenges/gaps from those. These recommendations should lay the foundation > for a follow-up W3C group. This group could take up the agenda of > establishing some standard(s) for addressing those challenges/gaps. yes, this is all our objectives here ! Just one remark: there might also be some challenges that are not relevant to W3C. So the roadmap might have a larger scope than just the W3C audience Best Stephane > thanks and regards > Arun Kumar > > World Wide Telecom Web (aka Spoken Web) : > http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_people.nsf/pages/arun_kumar.WWTW.html > > > > > Stephane Boyera > <boyera@w3.org> > Sent by: To > public-mw4d-reque public-mw4d@w3.org > st@w3.org cc > > Subject > 11/21/2008 10:25 Roadmap update and task definition > PM > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > I take an action during last call to launch a discussion on the list > about organizing better the work to "get things done" in a more > effective way. > This was a follow-up on a thread in the mailing-list 2 weeks ago > Read > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2008Nov/0038.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2008Nov/0041.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2008Nov/0044.html > > Let's start first with the goals of this group. > From the charter (http://www.w3.org/2007/12/MW4D/charter1.1.html ) > > 1- how are mobile platforms delivering ICT-based services? > 2- what are the strengths & weaknesses of the different ways > of delivering applications on mobile phones? > 3- what are the different type of challenges to developing & deploying > ICT-based services in rural & underprivileged populations? > 4- what are the challenges to capacity building, to stimulating > local content & app dev, and to empowering people? > > Instead of trying to adress these questions one by one, i propose that > we define a strategy to adress them all in parrallel, and define a set > of small tasks to different (set of) people and then merge the results > all together which should bring the first real draft of the roadmap. > > About question 1, as suggested in the thread i mentionned earlier, i > believe that we should start by investigating existing applications and > investigate the following aspects > - what is the technology used > - what are the requirements on device and network > - who is the content developer and provider (government/public sector, > big corporation, individual enterpreneur, grassroot/ngo) > - what are the socio-economic impacts of the services (what kind of > improvements for which segment of the population) > - what are the content provider challenges > - what are the access challenges (challenge for targeted users to access > the service) > - what are the cost and sustainability challenges > > any other aspect ? > > At http://www.w3.org/2008/MW4D/wiki/Stories there is a quite impressive > set of ressources including links to other existing database of similar > information. > so in order to share the load between us, what we could do is roughly > divide by type of applications: > - Education related services > - Agriculture > - Finance > - Health > - public/government > - disaster management > - Activism (this includes human rights report, election monitoring,...) > - conservation > > any other category ? > > About question 2, there are today 4 major ways of delivering content on > mobile phones: > using SMS > using Voice > using a Web browser > using a native applications > > Here again, we should consider having some people investigating each of > these branch. > Some of the aspects that would need to be considered > - what are the available tools to support apps authoring and/or > deployment using the technology > - what is the process/cycle for a content provider to develop and deploy > a service > - what are the discovery mechanisms for potential users to learn about > new services > - what are the requirements and cost of delivering a service > - what are the cost of accessing the service > - what are the requirements on the service developer (expertise, > hardware, software...) > - what are the requirements on infrastructure and handset > - what are the access challenges and potential strenghts for users > > the current roadmap document has quite a lot of information about the > last part. > Mobilehacking.org has lots of information about sms platform > we heard about voikiosk during last teleconference and Arun will rpovide > a summary of it > probably further investigation are needed about existing voice > experience, and on the mobile web side. > > About question 3, i don't think there is anything we should do, that are > not covered by the work described in Q1 and Q2 ? > > About question 4, there are already few experiences in teaching mobile > technologies at universities in Africa. EPROM is the first project who > explored this path (http://eprom.mit.edu/ ). We heard in brazil last > june that there are also experiences in Uganda (see > http://www.w3.org/2008/02/MS4D_WS/papers/MCASD_W3C.pdf) > I believe that existing experiences should be investigated. We should > list them and see in which domains (related to Q2 investigation) they > are applied, what are the impact in terms of employment, service > deployment,... what are the challenges (maintenance and development of > content, replicability, cost of training teachers,....) > > So this is my proposal for a potential strategy to develop our roadmap. > I propose we discuss this strategy till next call, and then we start > collecting the volunteers on the different task we identify. > > As soon as we have agreed on htis strategy i will describe it in the > roadmap document. > > cheers > Stephane > -- > Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org > W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 > BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 > F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, > France > > > -- Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2008 07:02:25 UTC