Re: Naming accidentals in the SMuFL scheme

Hi Martin,

Our goal is to change Emmentaler as little as possible over the move, so 
it'll definitely end up very different from MScore. (For one thing, I 
believe Emmentaler includes many more optional glyphs than I see in 
MScore at first glance.) That said, MScore looks like it will be very 
helpful as a reference.

We're still in the early stages of conversion, so there's nothing much 
to compare yet. If you're interested in following along, I'll be posting 
updates on the lilypond-devel@gnu.org mailing list.

Thanks for your help!
Owen

> Hi Owen,
>
> Over at MuseScore, we have a version of Emmentaler (called MScore) which is
> SMuFL compliant. I made a few changes to it earlier this year to fix some
> issues where it was deviating from SMuFL a bit.
>
> Bear in mind that some of the symbols in our version have been altered by
> various people over the years (notably, the accidentals) and I'm guessing
> that your version has also probably gone on its own journey too! All the
> same, I think it might be a useful reference, in addition to Bravura.
>
> Here's a link to the most recent version
> <https://www.dropbox.com/sh/tg7yklz3c8jgxww/AAAQa9vXx9i2ulAOcYUTS95Ga?dl=0  <https://www.dropbox.com/sh/tg7yklz3c8jgxww/AAAQa9vXx9i2ulAOcYUTS95Ga?dl=0>>
>
> At the very least, I'd be curious to hear how different our two versions
> are from each other.
>
> Thanks!
> Martin