- From: Jeremy Sawruk <jeremy.sawruk@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 16:52:33 -0400
- To: Albert Hart <alhart369@gmail.com>
- Cc: Music Notation Community Group <public-music-notation@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2020 20:52:57 UTC
Wouldn't C/3 be alto clef and C/4 be tenor clef? It's the same symbol, but at different vertical positions. That is why the line attribute is needed. On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 4:48 PM Albert Hart <alhart369@gmail.com> wrote: > Re: https://github.com/w3c/musicxml/issues/316#issuecomment-631558362 > "You might be better off asking questions like this on our mailing list > <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-music-notation/> instead of > GitHub. We try to reserve GitHub issues for ideas and bug reports as > opposed to user support questions." > > I posted this because it sounded like a "bug" to me, that the musicXML > format allows note and line in <clef> definition, and allows offsetting the > octave, but does not say what octave to use. > > If MuscXML only supports clefs by name - G, F, C, etc. - why does it > include the "line" attribute. Are their "G" clefs which have the G on a > different line. Is there is a clef like G/5 instead of G/2? > > -- > Al >
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2020 20:52:57 UTC