- From: Daniel Spreadbury <D.Spreadbury@steinberg.de>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 04:51:44 +0200
- To: Christof Schardt <christof@schardt.info>
- Cc: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF47A514A3.0A7A2AB0-ONC12582AE.000FB950-C12582AE.000FB950@LocalDomain>
Thanks for your email, Christof. The glyphnames.json file (https://github.com/w3c/smufl/blob/gh-pages/metadata/glyphnames.json) is actually correct: U+E56C is a “short trill” and U+E56D is “mordent”; there is no longer a glyph called “inverted mordent” in that range. The page on GitHub.io (https://w3c.github.io/smufl/gitbook/tables/common-ornaments.html) is not up-to-date with the metadata file because of a page build error that I have not yet had time to investigate, but which I will try to resolve soon. Sorry for the confusion! Daniel -----Christof Schardt <christof@schardt.info> wrote: ----- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org From: Christof Schardt <christof@schardt.info> Date: 06/08/2018 05:18AM Subject: Smufl: errors in metadata Two errors in glyphnames.json : "ornamentMordent": { "codepoint": "U+E56D", <----- should be U+E56C "description": "Mordent" }, "ornamentMordentInverted": { <----- is missing "codepoint": "U+E56D", "description": "Inverted mordent" }, One problem in naming: 4stringTabClef 6stringTabClef are not usable as C++ enums or defines (and problematic in most or all other languages). Idea: fourStringTabClef sixStringTabClef Better? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christof Schardt mailto:christof@schardt.info - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Phone: +49 (40) 21035-0 | Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net President: Andreas Stelling | Managing Director: Thomas Schöpe, Yoshiyuki Tsugawa Registration Court: Hamburg HRB 86534 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2018 02:52:12 UTC