- From: Daniel Spreadbury <D.Spreadbury@steinberg.de>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 04:51:44 +0200
- To: Christof Schardt <christof@schardt.info>
- Cc: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF47A514A3.0A7A2AB0-ONC12582AE.000FB950-C12582AE.000FB950@LocalDomain>
Thanks for your email, Christof.
The glyphnames.json file (https://github.com/w3c/smufl/blob/gh-pages/metadata/glyphnames.json) is actually correct: U+E56C is a “short trill” and U+E56D is “mordent”; there is no longer a glyph called “inverted mordent” in that range.
The page on GitHub.io (https://w3c.github.io/smufl/gitbook/tables/common-ornaments.html) is not up-to-date with the metadata file because of a page build error that I have not yet had time to investigate, but which I will try to resolve soon.
Sorry for the confusion!
Daniel
-----Christof Schardt <christof@schardt.info> wrote: -----
To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
From: Christof Schardt <christof@schardt.info>
Date: 06/08/2018 05:18AM
Subject: Smufl: errors in metadata
Two errors in glyphnames.json :
"ornamentMordent": {
"codepoint": "U+E56D", <----- should be U+E56C
"description": "Mordent"
},
"ornamentMordentInverted": { <----- is missing
"codepoint": "U+E56D",
"description": "Inverted mordent"
},
One problem in naming:
4stringTabClef
6stringTabClef
are not usable as C++ enums or defines (and problematic
in most or all other languages). Idea:
fourStringTabClef
sixStringTabClef
Better?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christof Schardt
mailto:christof@schardt.info
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Phone: +49 (40) 21035-0 | Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net
President: Andreas Stelling | Managing Director: Thomas Schöpe, Yoshiyuki Tsugawa
Registration Court: Hamburg HRB 86534
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2018 02:52:12 UTC